Markstrom Upset Amid Trade Talk, Future With Flames Unclear

In a recent interview, Markstrom took a clear jab at the organization’s higher-ups, expressing his dissatisfaction with how things were handled. As Eric Francis reports, speculation suggests the Flames may have asked him to waive his no-move clause, only to backtrack on a potential deal when they refused to retain salary. The details remain unclear, with conflicting reports on whether Markstrom was officially asked to waive the clause or merely consider a trade scenario.

Flames general manager Craig Conroy has not commented on the situation, leaving the question of Markstrom’s official trade situation unanswered. The uncertainty surrounding the goalie’s status has raised concerns about the relationship between player and management, with potential repercussions on a trade that may be on the horizon.

Have the Flames Burned Their Bridge with Markstrom?

The timing of any trade becomes a critical factor, as Markstrom could still be traded before March 8. At the same time, his value could be maximized by waiting until the summer. The New Jersey Devils are said to be pushing hard to get the Flames to deal him, but an off-season trade would open up a broader market with more bidders. Waiting means a higher cap ceiling across the league and other teams have the funds to take on bigger tickets.

All that said, Markstrom’s comments have fans wondering if this relationship is doomed long-term. His public blasting of management is not the move of a player who seems comfortable and wants to be part of things moving forward.

The Flames face the challenge of either trying to settle things or moving a player who feels slighted and would prefer a change of scenery.